Legal system under pressure to maintain its independence as China cracks down on dissent
Police stand guard outside West Kowloon Court in Hong Kong on Sept. 23, 2021, as 47 defendants were appearing in court charged with conspiracy to commit subversion under the national security law. (Photo: AFP)
Hong Kong's largest national security case was sent to trial on June 7 after lingering for 15 months in pre-trial procedures during which most of the 47 defendants were denied bail.
Under the national security law, which Beijing imposed in 2020 following huge, sometimes violent democracy protests, the pro-democracy figures are charged with "conspiracy to subversion" for organizing an unofficial primary election.
Subversion is one of the four major crimes under the security law and can carry a punishment of up to life in prison.
The defendants, aged between 24 and 66, include democratically elected lawmakers and district councilors, unionists, academics and others whose political stances range from modest reformists to radical localists.
The case was first brought to court in March 2021, when most of the 47 were denied bail after a four-day marathon hearing before a judge handpicked by the government to try national security cases.
Most of the pre-trial hearings over the past 15 months, though held in an open court, have been subject to reporting restrictions, with the court repeatedly refusing applications from defendants and journalists for them to be lifted.
More than 180 people have been arrested over the past two years since the security law came into force — the bulk of them activists, unionists and journalists — and 115 have been prosecuted
Family members and legal representatives have told AFP that the opaqueness has made the defendants "frustrated and depleted" and allowed the prosecution to "move the goalposts."
After a three-and-half-day hearing that began on June 1-2 and finished on June 7, all but one of the 47 defendants were committed to a senior court by principal magistrate Peter Law, one of the national security judges.
Those committed for trial include veteran activist "Long Hair" Leung Kwok-hung, barrister Lawrence Lau, journalist-turned-activist Gwyneth Ho and legal scholar Benny Tai, who was also one of the leaders of the Occupy Central movement in 2014.
Defendants who submit a non-guilty plea are committed for trial, and those who plead guilty committed for sentencing, according to the Magistrates Ordinance.
The one outstanding defendant will join the cohort later after further proceedings before the magistrate.
Hong Kong faces scrutiny over whether its legal system can maintain its independence as China cracks down on dissent with the security law.
Authorities say the security law has successfully returned stability to the financial hub, which was upended for seven straight months by large and sometimes violent protests in 2019
More than 180 people have been arrested over the past two years since the security law came into force — the bulk of them activists, unionists and journalists — and 115 have been prosecuted.
Three men have been convicted and sentenced to jail for 43 months to nine years. One of them sought to appeal his 69-month sentence on June 7, with the court reserving judgement until early September.
The 47 defendants form the largest group in one single case under the law.
Authorities say the security law has successfully returned stability to the financial hub, which was upended for seven straight months by large and sometimes violent protests in 2019.
But critics say it has eviscerated civil liberties and the political plurality the city used to enjoy.
Help us keep UCA News independent
The Church in Asia needs objective and independent journalism to speak the truth about the Church and the state.
With a network of professionally qualified journalists and editors across Asia, UCA News is just about meeting that need. But professionalism does not come cheap. We depend on you, our readers, to help maintain our independence and seek that truth.
A small donation of US$2 a month would make a big difference in our quest to achieve our goal.
Share your comments